://twitter.com/m etacritic/status/ 1336011501090471936?s=19. (Remove the spaces and add https at the beginning)

Cyberpunk has received a rating of 91. It's bad. I thought they were going to hit 96 at least

this is the worst click-bait from you yet.. 91 = bad review

It is bad. Witcher 3 has 93

It wont stay at 90, it might be lucky to get 80. Keep in mind the one's giving it 100 are irrelevant websites. It got low reviews from respectable websites such as gamespot (gave it a 7) and PC Gamer gave it a 7. ign overrates games so I am not surprised they rated it high. It does seem like cyberpunk is a flop, I have been hearing people saying it is full of bugs which lines up on the delays.

You really need to get some perspective. if you are wondering why you get downrated, its is post like these which make no logical sense.

45 would be a bad review if you think anything above 80 is bad reviews, then you are delusional. 91 is very good. I expect in the end that Cyberpunk would end up on an everage review of around 83-86, and that is still very good

edit -and anyway, this is just an arbitray number, there is really no difference between a 91 and a 96, or anything else. the number by itself is really completely meaningles

This is on a scale of 100. So you're saying if you and a class mate took a test and he scored 93 that you'd consider it a bad mark if you scored 91?

That aside, from the early reviews I'm reading it looks like the game is good but the bugs are horrendous. Something that will be fixed. It's just a question of whether they'll be able to squash enough of the bugs soon enough for it to matter.

Obvious clickbait thread is obvious. You really should start trying more with your constant near-spam.

Considering there was about 4 delays that is not a good thing and they should not get a pass.

Well, consider that CDPR has probably "convinced" some of the journalists to give out good reviews...

That happens with pretty much every major game release (and it's also why it is absolutely pointless to base anything off of journalist reviews).

And sorry but seeing 91 out of 100 and calling it bad is just pure lunacy. I can't imagine a world where this thread wasn't created just to have people tell you how completely off you are.

it is not woke enough

Oh, I'm not giving them a pass (I'm actually not even buying the game), but the bugs will likely be fixed. That's not to say they should be there in the first place: they shouldn't, especially, as you pointed out, given the numerous delays.

But, again, just from what I've read about the actual game content (bugs aside), I get the impression the game itself is good.

Whoah, now this is some breaking news right there. Definitely needs a separate thread. Especially as there are no Cyberpunk threads on the forum already where this could have been discussed.

Remember when I got banned for asking the OP how many more Cyberpunk threads he's going to make, something like 6 Cyberpunk threads of his ago? Good times, good times.

banned?:O

Testify, my friend! I just have to be careful of my wording, or I'll also face the banhammer again.