Posted March 30, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba15e/ba15eb381bba4845f13ce593e19053b89a21c8d7" alt="avatar"
New Vegas had the same reception with people calling it unplayable which was a complete lie. People seem to have a mental block that makes them forget the very unplayable state Fallout 3 shipped in. In most respects Obsidian improved a lot of the problems with the Gamebryo engine that plagued Fallout 3.
While I understand that people have different experiences I cannot for the life of me understand how Destructoid gave it a 2, sure a 4 if you truly didn't like it or had serious bugs but 2 means that it was pretty much unplayable by anyone, which it clearly wasn't. Did Michael Thorton touch the reviewer in a bad place? From that score I would take it as a serious possibility...
Or maybe I'm just upset that I'll never get to find out what was going on with Sis...