Man, I don't remember games on a floppy weighing in at around 53 megs :P

Yes, it's the talkie CD version :)

I don't remember any that large on the PC but I do recall some games having around 7 floppies or so, I think Ultima VII did although my memory is hazy about the details :/

Look, I understand frustration because in the age of instant gratification, we all want everything now. The simple fact is that we're balancing a number of things here when you see our release schedule:

1. Signing games. Working with big partners is not always easy; it is very nearly always slow, and just because we've signed an agreement for part of someone's catalog doesn't mean we have the whole thing. This is why sometimes you see a gap of a year or more between releases from someone's catalog: we had to re-negotiate and sign more games from them.

2. When it is best to release a game. You want all of the games for everything now. I get it. Waiting is no fun. But if we dumped, for example, eleven adventure games on one day, or one week, or even just all in a row, we'd either have a lot of games that get lost in the noise or a lot of people who are very unhappy. In either case, varying our release schedule by publisher and by genre is a good move for us.

3. When it is possible to release a game. We talk a lot about how much work we do to restore a game and get it ready for modern OSes. We also fully test all of our classic games. So pick a game series like Wizardry, or Ultima. These games are hundreds of hours long; testing them takes all of those hundreds of hours. Some games we find have bugs in certain OSes or hardware configs that require fixing-even if you've never experienced bugs in a game doesn't mean that someone else might and, if one of our common configs catches the bug, we have to try and fix it.

I see that to you being negative and demanding more seems like a way to get what you want from GOG.com: namely, more games faster. It's not, and that because we deliver games--classic and new--to you as quickly as we can regardless. I'm sorry that you think we're some kind of evil overlord who delights in making you miserable by deliberately making our release schedule to disappoint as many people as possible. I think by saying that, you're denigrating the very real work that all 55 people at GOG.com put in every day, trying to bring classic games to light again and further the cause of DRM-free gaming.

In either case, we will continue to release the best games we can find as quickly as we can; to do otherwise would be stupid for us as a business. Patience, and good things come to those who wait.

Our test team is fewer than 10, actually.

EDIT: And i'd note that only two or three of them have played any given game for work.

Nah, not really. I only step in every once in a while and even then I only do it on an emergency or something like that. I do have to give some major props to our QA team since I had some first-hand experience in what they do and it is not easy :)