Posted January 02, 2015
Hickory: Sorry to burst your bubble, but the 'canon' party contains no monks, and that includes player character. But I get what you mean. The problem is, regardless of what NotJabba says, a monk is pretty useless early game, unlike mages, who have other means at their disposal than melee. A monk cannot wear armour; cannot wear helmets; cannot use shields; only gets cleric XP & HD; can only use thief weapons (except staffs); must be lawful; must be human. There may be more restrictions that I cannot think of at this time. Not that any of those make any difference as the levels rise, and the monk's own abilities start to kick in. The problem is that in BG1 there is simply not enough XP to reach levels where a monk is worth a damn, unlike mages.
Edit: On the other hand... if you're not a power gamer -- I'm not -- then playing a monk would be fun, and a challenge. If you're not, then I say go for it.
He's correct. The Canon Main Character is a Fighter named Abdel Adrian. Just throwing that wee bit out there. Edit: On the other hand... if you're not a power gamer -- I'm not -- then playing a monk would be fun, and a challenge. If you're not, then I say go for it.
On topic though, You don't -need- armor. A Monk's abilities are more about dodging the blows, then accepting them and carrying on. While its true that monks don't get the really cool abilities until later on, a low level monk is still a cool experience to play as. And For Team Players(Those who play BG like a strategy RPG), its a very interesting take on the game, as your Monk will rely on buffs/teammates more often. I for one, would have loved to play a true monk in BG.