Posted April 05, 2021
morolf: Doesn't contradict anything I wrote, those games were also in poor taste.
Don't even know how one could make a game about the first Gulf war, the conflict was so one-sided, turkey-shooting on the highway of death isn't good gaming material, no real challenge.
And yet I could point to several games based on Desert Storm II & I, indie/shareware and commercial alike. Most people didn't care about the "Who" or "Why", they just wanted new strategy games set in a conflict that to them, wasn't morally grey. Heck, even Action 52 got in on it. Don't even know how one could make a game about the first Gulf war, the conflict was so one-sided, turkey-shooting on the highway of death isn't good gaming material, no real challenge.
(Of course there were some who were in true 90s fashion, casually racist about the whole affair, going beyond just singling out Saddam or whoever. Like Copysoft.)
The Korean War & Vietnam were wars without faces, because they were fought over valueless proxy interests.
That's what Mil funded projects like this are hoping.
Though that is a lost point, as it'd require them to actually respect the conflict in any manner instead of altering the facts like Activision
regularly and
blatantly does.
"What, we massacred a mass of people at a defenseless town? No, that was the Russians!" (See my previous point about who is giving them the paycheck.)
(If I were calling shots, I'd mandate that Activision put up a 10 second screen before the start of every session to remind players that the Call of Duty world and properties are strictly fiction and not based upon any factual basis in reality. The downtime could be used to I don't know, load a 4k texture from that paint huffer Tom Clancy's books.)
Post edited April 05, 2021 by Darvond