I'm fairly ambivalent when it comes to "Unvoting", I've already counted a vote earlier in the game where someone failed to do so.
Conditional or "auto-voting" as you call it, not happening. You'll just have to make a point to check in before deadline at Midnight tomorrow.

Well:
does this count? ;)

RWs point was to avoid FOS over exact word use. Paraphrasing is fine, so you CAN share your PM, just no guarantee it's genuine. Go back and read the top of post 1.

Did you miss Yog sharing his PM? The whole "ring" thing I mentioned? Arrg, I have to go dig them up? The first time was early on when he was still rhyming. He posted to Yog something about "I'm the same as you". Hyper pointed this out later.

The second time was recently, talking about all the info he'll have after tonight. How can you offer info unless you have a role? The first instance makes me think he's saying he's cop (only? also?). The second instance only implies role, but serves to backup a potential cop claim. So... points against Agent. I do? That seems pointless. Alright...

Unvote Hijack
Vote Yogsloth

As to the autovote thing, I can maybe see how it might be helpful for later analysis, but I've already stated I'll vote for whichever person will secure a lynch, and I'm doing so because I don't know if I'll be here at crunch time. Oh well, if RW denies, he denies. I'll just leave it on Yog then since he seems the one people will most likely vote for.

Nope.

*ahem* That's like not putting your money where your mouth is.

Shitpickle! Mchack I deplore you! You, sir, forced me to forget about my posting limitation.

@RWare (Yes, 5 letters, AHA!) Is there further limitation that comes with breaching the aforementioned limitation. Avoiding all these 4 letter words is one almost irrefutable quest.

Golly, I count seven (5+2) four-letter words. What will RW do now? I hope you're wearing a cup, hijack.

That is like five violations! The edit elves will not be happy! You are warned!
Nope, ahem, like, your and your...

2 girls one cup?

I goantse your point.

hehe, I kinda like them edit elves ;) (as a semi lurker myself I hope I'm not prone to have them on my back.)
On the off chance you need some kind of forgiveness from me for that lapse (don't know what your pm said about breaching the trust of the elves) you can have it. I chuckled at "shitpickle" :D

To be perfectly anal about it that list _was_ posted before the quote I gave you, were yogs acknoledged sage's contribution, so he might have written it differently afterwards. maybe not though. But anyway I see your point.

Still I'm thinking yogs doesn't only count posts but also the value of those. Lift for instance posted less than cristigale but isn't with the lurkers, but the neutral.

Did you look back through the posts? Did you find the points I mentioned? Your thoughts?

Grant me slack. It was all in one comment.

If a player was pointing fingers at 5 different players, all with weak arguments, would you consider that as five cases of mudslinging, or one case of mudslinging, because it was all in one comment? Do recall your posting limitation before answering.

God damn you guys talk a lot... when I'm not here.

I think I'm all caught up now, but a hell of a lot has happened.

I'll try get a proper post together when I'm not posting from my phone, but here's some notes off the top of my head.

I don't like JMich's vote on me. I feel like he's misrepresenting me by saying I went after yogs but to be honest I'd have to reread my own posts to be sure that's the case.. I certainly questioned him about his play as I failed to understand what the hell he was doing but I don't think I've ever (seriously) been on board with lynching him..

HijacK is HijacK.. I find BlueMooner a little suspicious but I think HijacK has over reacted majorly and voted for very poor reasons. But then, he does that a lot and he certainly feels more like town HijacK then scum one from last game but he may have learned from that and reverted to being more like his old self to avoid suspicion if he is scum again.
*shrugs* on the fence, but I would rather lynch him then have no lynch.

CSPVG and yogs both come out of the whole "useless" debate worse off. Whole thing actually looked a little contrived to me.

@yogs - I think a big flaw in your argument about how people who talk more are better and lurkers are bad is that you were the one who proved that scum can hide behind walls of text as much as they can lurking. That being said I'm generally in favour of lynching lurkers but only if there's not a better target (and quite frankly to me a better target is anyone I don't consider to probably be town who has a decent wagon, lynches are good remember!) and not on day 1 where there is so little to go on it's very difficult to find anything to post at all and maintaining my usual level of verbal (written?) diarrhoea is difficult.

@Hyper
I know you asked a question about my thoughts on HijacK's vote on BlueMooner, I may have answered it already above but I'll do so again just in case. I find the reasons I mentioned (which are some of the basis of HijacK's vote) to be enough to mean Blue needs to be watched more carefully but not strong reasons to place a vote on him, plus I'm not even sure what the basis for his vote even is as he seems to have a whole host of random reasons for it...

Anyway, deadline is closing in, and as the top three candidates seem to be me, yogs and HijacK then if we want a lynch it seems I need to
Unvote Agentcarr16
Vote HijacK

@RW
If HijacK can't use four letter words does that mean he can't vote? ;)

Two comments actually.

Contrived? Ahahaha!