No. I can only find out third party killers. SK or Lyncher. Not Mafia.

Yes. I asked Lift and his answer amounted to maybe yes maybe no maybe go play with yourself. Turns out yes.

Potayto Potahto.

(actually isn't the "Coward" role called Hider elswhere on Mafia wiki?)

Oh boy!

No idea, I never heard of either till this game, that's why I asked.

Turns out not exactly. Hider is different
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Hider

I have to admit it was great teamwork: A great assist followed by an excellent slam dunk

And No-way. The effect suggested that you turned into a handsome man. I don't want to ruin that :)

Can someone please elaborate that or lead me to a source where I can understand it better.

Third party roles don't belong to either faction (nor Town nor Mafia). They have their own win conditions. e.g. Survivor's condition is to be alive at the end, regardless who wins.

Some third party roles can kill

Serial Killer:
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Serial_Killer

Lyncher doesn't kill per se, but wins when his target (Lynchee) dies. It's specifically mentioned to give a positive result to my FBI profiler
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Condemner

(NOTE: the role has been recently renamed to Condenmer in line with mafiascum's policy of avoiding the dreadful L-word).

There is supposedly a 3rd party in the game or ZFR's claimed role is a red herring. Or he is lying about it.

new page bump

Quick reply working again, too.

I watched trent on N1. At that point I still thought there was a reasonable chance he was

town and would self confirm the next day so I thought I might catch someone coming to kill

him. Instead the only person I saw visit him was GH, which is something we found out the

next day anyway.

Last night I used coward-finder on bucktoothgamer, which would have given me a positive or

negative result and verified his claim. The fact it failed obviously has no bearing on

btg's alignment, but I'm beginning to think my instincts were right.

Is that second question aimed at me? You'll need to be more specific because it's not

ringing any bells.

Why didn't you investigate flub again on N2 since you didn't get a chance to on N1? You said you suspected him of being a lyncher, what changed?

Well my role is explicitly LOUD in the event of a failure, I have conditional loud

modifier. As for being infected, it sounds like you lost your night action on the night you

were infected and gained it on the night you were healed. Given the way it seems to work,

you might be able to infer that you were infected anyway, although I guess you're thinking

it should be indistinguishable from being roleblocked or jailed?

Because your power is harmless to them as long as they don't aim at you. Knowledge is

enough to protect them from you, they don't need to kill you when they could be killing

someone else.

Lolno.

Spoken like a true yogsloth in the first Harry Potter game.

(For those of you who weren't there, I mean a mafioso complaining the game is unfair.)

It had crossed my mind that the note to Trent and the infection thing could be an elaborate

ruse. You are both experienced players after all. You'd only need to withhold it for one

night for the plan to work (it wasn't a sure thing that you'd lose Trent on D2 after all).

I'm not sure how I feel about you having brought it up, that in itself is WIFOMy. On the

one hand why would scum!ZFR draw attention to what actually happened? On the other hand,

perhaps that's the point.

Well being second on trent's wagon on D1, it's possible he didn't think trent was a likely

lynch and it was a distancing vote. Once the wagon got going he couldn't really jump off

without a good reason. On D2 when the wagon was for realz from the start, he couldn't bring

himself to bus his buddy. I dunno, it's not completely damning but it's far from making him

look particularly townie.

Ok, that's the second time you've posted exactly this. You're awfully eager to dissuade

people from voting for him.
If scum, second vote on D1 is hardly bussing and more likely distancing.
Reluctance to join that wagon on D2 looks more like reluctance to bus. It's not strong either way, it neither condemns nor aquits him.

It's kind of weird that you're putting this much effort into defending him. Is btg your buddy and are you freaking out about possibly losing him so soon after bussing trent?

I see there's still another page to come so I'll post this and carry on.

hope there's no shocking revelations on the next page that make all the stuff you just said irrelevant!

Thank you very much for this.

Oh God, now I have to think about 3rd parties... My brain hurts... so many possibilities :))

Well this is heading in an interesting direction.

Oho! AH!

Hmm, this is interesting. You have no way of knowing which killed blotunga so it's kind of weird that you're exonerating btg with no particular reasoning, but it's good that we can narrow it down.

Oh, well that was easy?

ZFR finds neutral killing roles. As he said in his claim, all he knows is that Joe is town or mafia and not neutral. Still, I'm not suggesting Joe is scum, just that ZFR hasn't proven him not to be.

Curse you! Also well done.

I have to say I'm a little confused as to why dedo gave up so easily. All he had to do was falseclaim and point the finger at btg.

does scum hunter send a message to his scumbuddy through the courrier?

does scum engerek start shooting off in all directions, or do they just quietly make their team untrackable?

does scum catte try and do something to bucktooth? what could that be?

Lolle, forgot to

vote dedo

Sheer poetry.

Guys, I caught the third scum!