It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
dtgreene: Actually, I would look at things from a different angle; are those so-called "crimes" really so bad?

For example, when it comes to immigration, is it really that much of a problem if uncontrolled immigration happens? Is having an influx of immigration really a big deal? Would it be that much of a problem if the US, by treaty, unconditionally legalized immigration with its neighbors? (For the sake of argument, let's assume things go both ways.) Would the US actually be getting more immigrants coming in than those who decide to leave the US?

So, in the case of illegal immigration, I think the best solution is to change the laws so that all immigration is legal; that means there's no more illegal immigration, and the problem is solved.
avatar
richlind33: Ask the people at the bottom who depend on social services how they feel about having to compete with an increasing population that is mostly dirt poor, for resources that are being cut annually.
Not only them, but ask the people who came over legally. Those that jumped through every hoop to become US citizens and make a better life for their family.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Ask the people at the bottom who depend on social services how they feel about having to compete with an increasing population that is mostly dirt poor, for resources that are being cut annually.
That assumes that:
1. More poor people come here than leave here.
2. The poor people take more resources than they provide.

I have a feeling that at least one of these assumptions would end up not being true.

(Also, one could solve much of the freeloading issues by requiring that a non-citizen be a resident for a certain amount of time before getting benefits like welfare.)

avatar
richlind33: Ask the people at the bottom who depend on social services how they feel about having to compete with an increasing population that is mostly dirt poor, for resources that are being cut annually.
avatar
Firefox31780: Not only them, but ask the people who came over legally. Those that jumped through every hoop to become US citizens and make a better life for their family.
The problem is that coming here legally, if you're a person, is much harder than it should be; IMO it should be as easy as moving from one state to another in the US currently is. (Speaking of which, do any US states have problems resulting from immigration from other US states?)

On the other hand, corporations can currently move easily between places. This creates an unfair situation when companies can easily move overseas, but workers don't have that same right.
Post edited March 18, 2018 by dtgreene
Great idea.
avatar
Tauto: Great idea.
Copying and pasting or running out of things to say?

I'll get on board as soon as the BIGGEST dealers (and killers) of them all (the ones I mentioned in my OP) are included. But I'll go ahead now and be willing to bet every dollar of every member of my extended family will EVER make that it won't include them. No... in the world today if you wear a hoodie and jeans and commit a crime against a few... OFF WITH YOUR HEAD but if you wear a suit and tie and commit a crime against the many... BONUSES AND PAY RAISES FOR YOU!!!.

Hard to get any more wrong than that.
avatar
robomagon: Based Trump.
avatar
tinyE: I know I'm going to regret asking, but huh? :P
What they mean is trump is based.
avatar
richlind33: Ask the people at the bottom who depend on social services how they feel about having to compete with an increasing population that is mostly dirt poor, for resources that are being cut annually.
avatar
dtgreene: That assumes that:
1. More poor people come here than leave here.
2. The poor people take more resources than they provide.

I have a feeling that at least one of these assumptions would end up not being true.

(Also, one could solve much of the freeloading issues by requiring that a non-citizen be a resident for a certain amount of time before getting benefits like welfare.)
#1 is absurd, and #2 isn't far behind because whatever contributions they end up making do not go into the social services kitty to make up for what is taken out. The people that benefit the most are those who are exploiting black market labor, and the net effect is the importation of Third World living conditions, because these people are able to get by by cramming multiple families into single family housing -- which doesn't strike me as being the least bit "progressive".
Post edited March 18, 2018 by richlind33
avatar
drmike: Then we told her how much it costs for a single inmate to serve a life sentence.
Actually that argumend had always buffled me. I mean you just putting a guy in a box, denying him most of the civil liberties. All you have to do is to force him to work to pay up for his crimes. How can you fail to make that cost efficient?
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: That assumes that:
1. More poor people come here than leave here.
2. The poor people take more resources than they provide.

I have a feeling that at least one of these assumptions would end up not being true.

(Also, one could solve much of the freeloading issues by requiring that a non-citizen be a resident for a certain amount of time before getting benefits like welfare.)
avatar
richlind33: #1 is absurd, and #2 isn't far behind because whatever contributions they end up making do not go into the social services kitty to make up for what is taken out. The people that benefit the most are those who are exploiting black market labor, and the net effect is the importation of Third World living conditions, because these people are able to get by by cramming multiple families into single family housing -- which doesn't strike me as being the least bit "progressive".
It is impossible for #1 to be true everywhere; if we assume it is, where are the poor people coming from?

For #2, the so-called "exploiting black market labor" is really just a nasty way of saying "giving immigrants jobs". Make all immigration legal, apply minimum wage (and other labor) laws to immigrant labor, and you no longer have an issue here. (Note that earning minimum wage requires that one work, so the immigrant is definitely contributing to society here.)

Also, getting by by living frugal isn't a bad thing; in fact, someone who lives frugal and is able to make some money will eventually be able to afford better housing.


avatar
drmike: Then we told her how much it costs for a single inmate to serve a life sentence.
avatar
LootHunter: Actually that argumend had always buffled me. I mean you just putting a guy in a box, denying him most of the civil liberties. All you have to do is to force him to work to pay up for his crimes. How can you fail to make that cost efficient?
Forcing somebody to work, aside from being basically slavery (though permitted by the US Constitution), doesn't work if the person is unable to work.

(Also, not every inmate is a guy.)
Post edited March 18, 2018 by dtgreene
avatar
richlind33: #1 is absurd, and #2 isn't far behind because whatever contributions they end up making do not go into the social services kitty to make up for what is taken out. The people that benefit the most are those who are exploiting black market labor, and the net effect is the importation of Third World living conditions, because these people are able to get by by cramming multiple families into single family housing -- which doesn't strike me as being the least bit "progressive".
avatar
dtgreene: It is impossible for #1 to be true everywhere; if we assume it is, where are the poor people coming from?

For #2, the so-called "exploiting black market labor" is really just a nasty way of saying "giving immigrants jobs". Make all immigration legal, apply minimum wage (and other labor) laws to immigrant labor, and you no longer have an issue here. (Note that earning minimum wage requires that one work, so the immigrant is definitely contributing to society here.)

Also, getting by by living frugal isn't a bad thing; in fact, someone who lives frugal and is able to make some money will eventually be able to afford better housing.
#1 IS true on the whole, and you should be researching this instead of making a bunch of poorly informed assumptions.

Anyway, go tell Goldman Sachs that they have to start paying the slave laborers a living wage and let us know what they tell you. o.O
avatar
BlueMooner: Go after the businesses that use illegals, revoke their licenses, and with no jobs, the people will leave on their own.
The program for this is called E-Verify, and it aims to do exactly that. But yet those in Congress will still come up with reasons why this isn't a good idea.. some states have it as law, but it needs to be nationwide to have a real impact.

And of course California being California prohibited municipalities from mandating it...
Post edited March 18, 2018 by user deleted
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: It is impossible for #1 to be true everywhere; if we assume it is, where are the poor people coming from?

For #2, the so-called "exploiting black market labor" is really just a nasty way of saying "giving immigrants jobs". Make all immigration legal, apply minimum wage (and other labor) laws to immigrant labor, and you no longer have an issue here. (Note that earning minimum wage requires that one work, so the immigrant is definitely contributing to society here.)

Also, getting by by living frugal isn't a bad thing; in fact, someone who lives frugal and is able to make some money will eventually be able to afford better housing.
avatar
richlind33: #1 IS true on the whole, and you should be researching this instead of making a bunch of poorly informed assumptions.

Anyway, go tell Goldman Sachs that they have to start paying the slave laborers a living wage and let us know what they tell you. o.O
#1 can't be true everywhere; in particular, the poor people have to come from somewhere, and hence it can't be true in both the originating nation and the target nation.

avatar
richlind33: USERNAME:dtgreene#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:88#Q&_^Q&Q#Go after the businesses that use illegals, revoke their licenses, and with no jobs, the people will leave on their own.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:88#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
richlind33:
Just so you know, your post here just attributed to me something I did not say. (If you look at the posts I *did* make, you will notice that my view on the issue is not the same as what the quote implies.)
Post edited March 18, 2018 by dtgreene
high rated
avatar
dtgreene: For example, when it comes to immigration, is it really that much of a problem if uncontrolled immigration happens? Is having an influx of immigration really a big deal? Would it be that much of a problem if the US, by treaty, unconditionally legalized immigration with its neighbors? (For the sake of argument, let's assume things go both ways.) Would the US actually be getting more immigrants coming in than those who decide to leave the US?

So, in the case of illegal immigration, I think the best solution is to change the laws so that all immigration is legal; that means there's no more illegal immigration, and the problem is solved.
Wow, just wow. I don't want to be an ass, but I've seen you post now on a butch of issues from gender to illegal immigration and I have to be honest, it's views like this that make me fearful for the future of this country.

By some estimations, the planet will be overpopulated by 2040 - 2050. So lets just open up our borders & share our already limited resources so that when the time comes we now have millions of more people that would not have existed in America if not for open borders or illegal immigration. Resource that could be the difference between living long enough to find a solution to said problem for millions of Americans.

So we have to pray to whoever that technology actually allows us to solve this problem before it gets out of control and all while making the situation worse on ourselves in the mean time. I mean we already have homeless vets and states with high poverty (hello CA), but sure more people... I bet that will solve the problem. Anyone want to place bets?

But yes, yes I know that you will think I'm cruel to suggest America worry about it's own citizens over all others (and by the way I suggest the same for other countries). But to this I say, I will always put the well being of myself and my family above all else like any rational human being would. it's a doggy dog world.

We elect a government to do what is in OUR (as in American citizens) best interest and to look out for OUR well being... I know some members of government fail to understand that though.

That doesn't even begin to go into the other huge impacts the unchecked immigration would cause, from the disenfranchised workforce (which will happen when the number of people coming here outpaces created jobs) turning American into the literal "shithole" that people are trying to escape creating chaos for people having every right to be here being natural-born citizens. Do you really think people would not flood in from South America, Africa, Middle East, etc and literally tank our economy with open borders?

To the loss of American culture, I mean sure who cares if my kids don't get to experience the America I know and grew up in right? In some places "Spanish" makes up a lot of the language spoken in certain states... in America. Now you may not think that a bad thing, but when you already have underpaid teachers with overcrowded classrooms trying to teach kids who can't even understand what they are being taught due to a language barrier you got issues, issues that have a lasting impact. You got demonstrators marching in the street waving Mexican flags... in America. Which like is their right and everything, more power to them... but if Mexico was so great, why did you come to the USA again?

The simple fact is unchecked immigration leads to zero integration, immigration without integration is an invasion. We see the impacts of that in states like California already were unchecked immigration has led to a huge cultural shift with huge portions of the immigrant communities have nearly no integration into American society and American values.

Sorry but I want my kids and grand kids to grow up in an America that still resembles America. If that makes me a "bad guy" then so be it. I mean, if I saw somebody that needs help, and I could provide help...I would help them regardless of their immigration status, but that doesn't mean I agree with their choices in the grand scheme of things.

"Open borders" would be America shooting itself in the foot... I'm not against controlled immigration, far from it... unless you are a Native American you are a decedent of an immigrant. Controlled immigration has a lot of value and can do a lot of good for a country in moderation, but one can recognize that without going to the deep end that is open borders.

Nobody thought Rome (a mighty empire of the time) would fall either, but let history be the proof of what happens with huge expansion with no integration and lost values. It wasn't the only cause of Rome's downfall, but it was a big factor. The same is true of immigration with no integration and too many people, too fast it is a huge cultural shift.

It one of the contributing factors as to why people in America today are so divided...

avatar
dtgreene: Just so you know, your post here just attributed to me something I did not say. (If you look at the posts I *did* make, you will notice that my view on the issue is not the same as what the quote implies.)
My mistake, was in error. Fixed.
Post edited March 18, 2018 by user deleted
avatar
USERNAME:dtgreene#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:88#Q&_^Q&Q#For example, when it comes to immigration, is it really that much of a problem if uncontrolled immigration happens? Is having an influx of immigration really a big deal? Would it be that much of a problem if the US, by treaty, unconditionally legalized immigration with its neighbors? (For the sake of argument, let's assume things go both ways.) Would the US actually be getting more immigrants coming in than those who decide to leave the US?

So, in the case of illegal immigration, I think the best solution is to change the laws so that all immigration is legal; that means there's no more illegal immigration, and the problem is solved.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:88#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
USERNAME:dtgreene#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:101#Q&_^Q&Q#Just so you know, your post here just attributed to me something I did not say. (If you look at the posts I *did* make, you will notice that my view on the issue is not the same as what the quote implies.)#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:101#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
The easiest way to stop immigration is to stop their welfare. After a few days rioting they'd all go back to the sh*tholes whence they cometh. QED
avatar
White_Barry: The easiest way to stop immigration is to stop their welfare.
Yes I agree with that. End welfare and enforce E-Verify and the problem will slowly self correct. Unfortunately, to many people stand in way of actually wanting to fix a very real issue.
high rated
avatar
richlind33: #1 IS true on the whole, and you should be researching this instead of making a bunch of poorly informed assumptions.

Anyway, go tell Goldman Sachs that they have to start paying the slave laborers a living wage and let us know what they tell you. o.O
avatar
dtgreene: #1 can't be true everywhere; in particular, the poor people have to come from somewhere, and hence it can't be true in both the originating nation and the target nation.
There is a net INflux, and the reason why is simple: America had a graying population, which means an economic collapse for the banksters that depend on continuous economic growth to keep their Ponziesque monetary system afloat.

What you should be asking is why do the Latin American nations have shit economies in spite of having a fairly large quantity of resources, for which the answer is: the economic relationship between the US and Latin America is mercantilist rather than capitalist, and nations that have attempted to put their *own* interests first are typically subjected to subversion that oftentimes involves torture and mass murder.