htown1980: I do love Cleve's over confident misstatement of the law. I can't wait to see what he posts next.
If legal proceedings are filed, I suspect they will be interesting (in the context of what would normally be a fairly dry and dull issue).
johnki: The thing is he literally has no claim to it. Failing to protect the trademark means he'd lose it. As stated in another post, PLENTY of games with the word "grimoire" have come out other than this one. Second, he's had 18 years to register that trademark. My understanding is that they beat him to it? He can't blame them for that.
And...now he's insulting their lawyer and name dropping. Wow, Cleve. Wow.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1909687745/grimoire/comments?cursor=7899898#comment-7899897 Different jurisdictions have slightly different laws so its not always as straight forward as that, but that's a pretty good summary. Cleve is way too confident of his position.
There was a decision handed down last year in the Supreme Court of Western Australia which I was reminded of when I read Cleve's comments (the decision related to arguments made by some crazy people here who think the government is illegal, and are particularly arrogant about their beliefs):
"Grounds of appeal like these are promoted by a small group of sad and deluded individuals who labour on in their delusions despite comprehensive rejection by the Court of Appeal and the General Division. Law students are required to study constitutional law and are examined on their knowledge as a prerequisite for legal practice. It is a peculiar arrogance for an appellant to believe that without similar study they know better. Psychologists refer to this syndrome as the Dunning Kruger effect. Judicial time is a scarce public resource to be spent in resolution of issues of substance not to be squandered on applications of legal incoherence."
Probably a bit harsh, as Cleve's comments are not
completely without merit...