Posted May 03, 2023
Once again: There is nothing indecent directly on GoG. Nudes and the like. If common pictures can harm someone, how do they even walk the streets? How do they watch movies and animations on TV?
And what should be going on in a person’s head so that he puts in one row “I don’t consider it necessary to introduce additional censorship where children should not be, under the pretext that they might see something wrong” (I’ll ask again - what exactly can they see here now?) and "yes, dude, you can drag minors into bed"?..
P.S.: By the way, minors may well sneak into your bedroom and see what they should not. So everyone should stop having sex so as not to hurt anyone
JuWalk: About the kid by the road [...]
I CAN intervene in this situation, but I don't HAVE to. It all depends on my desire to intervene or just pass by.
BreOl72: Thanks for the confirmation. All I needed to know about you.
neumi5694: So do yours. If you compare the brothel situation to seeing people in clothes (there is not even censored nudity on the GOG homepage), what does that tell us about you?
If someone else had made that analogy, what would you think about him?
Would you believe him if he said he is sane?
You had to make this personal, so don't be surprised if you get answers matching your tone.
BreOl72: You really don't like to read, do you?
But that's ok - tells me all I need to know about you, too. This is exactly how it works. And not just for me, but for everyone. A person is obliged to do only what is prescribed in the law. In all other cases, he is free to do as he pleases, depending on the circumstances. And the fact that you are trying to hang extra obligations on someone says a lot about yourself.
I explain for those who do not know how to think with their heads - no, I will not pass by a child who risks getting hit by a car. But not because I have to intervene. And because I want to do it. Because in this example, the risk is quite real. But "kids can go to a site that they are not allowed to go to and get harmed by absolutely decent pictures, so you have to do something!!!111" is bullshit
---
In order to protect them from some kind of harm, a warning has already been issued "If you are under 18, get out of here". That's all, the obligations on the part of the site are fulfilled. Only they and their parents are responsible for the further development of events. If they want to do something forbidden and their parents don't mind - why should outsiders interfere?
And what should be going on in a person’s head so that he puts in one row “I don’t consider it necessary to introduce additional censorship where children should not be, under the pretext that they might see something wrong” (I’ll ask again - what exactly can they see here now?) and "yes, dude, you can drag minors into bed"?..
P.S.: By the way, minors may well sneak into your bedroom and see what they should not. So everyone should stop having sex so as not to hurt anyone
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e895d/e895d693f9a0d79b93ad049c0d44b79211c63402" alt="avatar"
I CAN intervene in this situation, but I don't HAVE to. It all depends on my desire to intervene or just pass by.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002ed/002edb947a4fa4317377c534b5f4470d27310193" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86813/8681309b26cf7b18b96be2c7437063c033c1bc55" alt="avatar"
If someone else had made that analogy, what would you think about him?
Would you believe him if he said he is sane?
You had to make this personal, so don't be surprised if you get answers matching your tone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002ed/002edb947a4fa4317377c534b5f4470d27310193" alt="avatar"
But that's ok - tells me all I need to know about you, too.
I explain for those who do not know how to think with their heads - no, I will not pass by a child who risks getting hit by a car. But not because I have to intervene. And because I want to do it. Because in this example, the risk is quite real. But "kids can go to a site that they are not allowed to go to and get harmed by absolutely decent pictures, so you have to do something!!!111" is bullshit
---
In order to protect them from some kind of harm, a warning has already been issued "If you are under 18, get out of here". That's all, the obligations on the part of the site are fulfilled. Only they and their parents are responsible for the further development of events. If they want to do something forbidden and their parents don't mind - why should outsiders interfere?
Post edited May 03, 2023 by JuWalk