I do agree with this, but just because people are not aware enough to react to it doesn't mean it's right. It's still wrong, and like was said above, for people who do know what's going on it certainly doesn't feel right to see a update almost exclusive centered around introducing facebook integration.
I also don't know anyone who votes by what they see on facebook, but sure if people need to believe that it has had any impact on this election (I mean what # are we up to now on reasons why Hillary lost... I really can't keep count?), then more power to them I guess.
It honestly baffles me when people make this argument and it just shows how little people realize what effect the internet has on them. Facebook and other media are vulnerable to creating safe spaces of like minded poeople. All these kind of safe spaces need to guide opinion is misguided stories/fake news to be introduced and have these stories get linked/reposted by friends to give added validity. Sometimes some particularly biased newsmedia picks these stories up as well. (Alex Jones for instance) It's easy for people to get influenced like this. And it's not just one thing, or two, it's a continuous reinforcement by your peers and the media that those stories are correct, because they end up sharing the same ones over time.
It's things like this that had people harass and threaten workers at a pizzeria and one eventually even shooting it up with an AR-15 at it because they had become convinced that Hillary Clinton was running a child sex trafficking ring out of it.
USERNAME:Pheace#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:24#Q&_^Q&Q#including misusing that data to affect election results.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:24#Q&_^Q&Q#
I was thinking about Brexit actually but yeah the recent US elections do appear to be involved to some extent as well. Doesn't matter which side did it. The fact that it is possible *and* is being done needs to be changed. Rules need to be laid down for this to make sure that it can't happen in the future, by anyone.