Quote tags might be easier to parse. Also, if you'd like. We could move to a medium a bit more reliable for communication. The gog forums are really, really unstable.
aDyingLight: my bet was, after proving them [the people] that together, REALLY putting our best efforts in our own sake, letting the entire pack of lies aside, we could build the welfare non-state we need in order to SURVIVE. we are already in times of survival, and it's not because of the covid, the covid is just another step towards absolute control. and no, i'm not automatically aligned to conspiracionist bs, i did my research in order to understand what's going on with the world and what we could reasonably do towards making something, anything about it. it seems i've failed to find 'neutral' people, aware of this situation and able to work our way around it, in an orderly, truly democratic manner.
I'm not sure what you mean. I've lost my grandmother to this, but more surprisingly, my girlfriend, who is an LPN, almost died of it and her sense of smell barely works to this day, and she was infected back in December. I understand and can see that the virus is obviously being used for control, but on the other hand it's also very real and very dangerous, especially to people in high risk occupations where they're likely to get a high viral load prior to becomming symptomatic (seems to be the highest predictor of mortality). There is empirical evidence of both exploitation of the disease as well as danger from the disease, so this is a particularly hard issue to move your average person on, because most people cling to an opinion once they have one if it's really, really important to their worldview. With an issue like this, it's important to show people that their legitimate concerns are real while disagreeing with them (IE. If you oppose lockdowns, point out COVID is real prior to criticizing the lockdowns by demonstrating they're ineffecive, and how they actually make covid infections themselves more deadly, which is something that no one discusses).
i ask myself if there's a limit for people's tolerance. china proves there's none. brazil proves there's none. and i'm ultimately convincing myself it's just not worth my efforts, which in conclusion makes me this sad. yes, i can't Live in a world like this, and i am shouting out loud so if there's a single like-minded soul able to help, please do so, so we may have a chance together.
I don't know what you mean by China and brazil proving there is no limit for tolerance.
which is why i [also failed in trying] tried to gather some game makers and build ourselves a way out of this. is this my last attempt? all tells it so.
Would be easier to start alone and make some basic projects that attact attention of other devs. Most coders are proud and seeking solitude from my own experience. They need an incentive to break away from that.
that's another reason why i also incorporated the anti-cloud mindset, fighting against online-only/games-as-a-service, ultimately any mandatory streaming-only model or anything remotely controlled. but... gamers won't mind it, the corrupted industry proving they'll do anything they want, gamers will support.
From a practical outlook, most games cannot function with that model. No one takes Stadia seriously, or playstation Now's streamed games. Sony had to change things so that some games could run on the PS4 instead of being streamed, because streaming games doesn't work. It's obvious to nearly everyone i talk to that always-online and such is a scam and not healthy. The thing is, people don't see viable alternatives to their AAA favorites, which means they must be built.
altruism would suffice. altruism would save us all...
...
in the end, conding skills would help understanding the way everything's deranging. but as you said, some political interest is needed, and since politics is also corrupted along everything else, altruism was my bet.
Specifically, i don't mean in general, but for the issue i mentioned. There's a movement right now towards making coders get licenses to code just like doctors need licenses to practice. However, you must both be aware of coding practices a well as have your ear to the ground in politics to see that this movement is forming. It's coming under the name of "security." Google recently changed how android works which restricts apps like Termux from allowing to develop android apps on android devices w/o the use of a computer. Only older devices can continue this process.
i'm failing to do, eihter. that's why i am here, asking for help...
If people are truly receptive, it should be easy. What kind of problems are you having?
i didn't. i only buy games that are complete, of course they are mostly years old, i refuse to give away real Life info to any 'service' out there, no credit card is stored in any store [despite the inconvenience], i refuse to support greedy companies, i tell everyone my practices and now they make sense to them - finally, after the CDPR bubble, people are waking.
You blind innocent soul. Do you have a job? Do you have a 401K or money in any stocks? If so, there's where you contribute the most. This is where the talking is, not purchases. No one buys a game? It's blamed on gamers. Company violates a certain "wide practice" policy, and it's the company's fault, even if the sale go up.
let's pick this one: Steam's my major platform, i do not own consoles, galaxy's not an option, nor any other one [origin and uplay in mind]. at the early stages of covid, i offered to be a game partner for the ones suffering from isolation. had two or three sessions out of it, despite my efforts and commitment in being online, ready to play the other person's favorite titles!
These posts were saturating most major platforms, so i'm guessing your case here was a saturation issue. It's likle putting a game-changing game on itch.io. No one's going to notice it.
once i asked for more people to join, one told me it looked like a job.
Probably your wording or any "requirements" you posted.
the other day i noticed quite a few people interested in playing 'x' game [Need for Speed Rivals/Hot Pursuit, Insane 2, Carmageddon Max Damage and Vector Thrust, to name a few], so i announced that at day 'y', 'z' time i'd be hosting. no one showed up. for 2 or 3 weekends, varied times.
Well, was the timezone specified? What time were they? Were there any other games going on at that time? How saturated were the steam boards that you were talking on? How many people were actually reading those boards?
once i found a bunch of guys and finally we got regular in playing Rainbow Six Vegas 2 and Left 4 Dead 2 [which is not a problem finding sessions for], the former being interesting: despite my ping being a tad high for them and Vegas 2 being stale network-wise, sometimes people would wait in queue just to play in sessions i was hosting, they liking my play style and friendliness. now Vegas 2 is dead [yes, I HATE corporate server based gaming!], and... well, i like to play other genres, too.
So you're relying on a reputation that you have in 1 game, but doesn't exist in communities in other games. Means you have to find a way to build it again.
something for the trolls...
once i joined a group, 'friends... care'. they didn't cared.
I always say that any company or group advertisement is usually the lie they have to cover. By making something a motto, it becomes a given that isn't questioned. Kinda like GOG and DRM-free.
"I'd like to know why my experience is different from yours."
>>this is something that's really bothering, kohlrak. not on gaming... Life in general, as you can tell.
Right, and i'm a straight white male, the worst of the worst in today's society. There's something wrong with your approach or something, because i don't have these problems. There's definitely something you're missing, and from this conversation i don't know what it is.