It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/

more in screenshot

I thought some of you might tick drm
Attachments:
I'd tick them all.

Alternatively, I'd tick "video games." Why didn't they think of that option?
Post edited June 02, 2019 by clarry
1. DRM.
2. Microtransactions for bits and pieces, I don't wanna go broke in order to play the complete game as the developers intended.

I don't care about bad online play, no new ideas or poor quality control since it doesn't affect me. I do my research and avoid titles that don't interest me. With all the information available today, you only have yourself to blame if you buy a bad game.

Also, if you pre-order games, you more or less deserve to get ripped-off. I would guess that those who pre-order are those that are having issues with bad quality control and boring content.
Post edited June 02, 2019 by user deleted
avatar
BeatriceElysia: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/

more in screenshot

I thought some of you might tick drm
Sad thing is I know a lot of people, many of them in here, who would have no problem with that.
I ticked DRM. Here the complete results so far, in the screenshot I attached.
Attachments:
results.jpg (60 Kb)
I'd tick everything as well if we could. But went for DRM.

The gaming industry has mostly gone to hell. At this point I'm fairly sure every developer and publisher out there have dedicated meetings every week where they bounce around ideas about how they can screw over their customers in new and more sinister ways.
As others, I would tick everything. I chose DRM as well since Microtransactions can be avoided easily.
Is there an option to vote for "big 'game journalism' sites like Gamespot, IGN, Kotaku, and Polygon?" I'm assuming no right? I suspect that would require them to be too honest if they were to allow such an option.