advancedhero: I have just discovered the 1984 classic game 'Elite', and it has easily skyrocketed into my top 15 games ever list. I can't believe I had never played it before. I can definitely see where Wing Commander got a lot of it's mechanics from. Sure it's old clunky and it's graphics are not too great, but there is something genuinely wonderful about it. And so I just want to urge anyone who is interested in games like Wing Commander or Freespace to check out this gem of history. There are probably posts like this before, but oh well, I just love this game.
http://www.iancgbell.clara.net/elite/index.htm I'm glad that you are enjoying it, it is a good game and is worthy of the praise it has received for over 25 years, I used to play it at school on a Beeb., HOWEVER.. if I can just switch to cynical mode for a sec...If I was a conspiracy betting man I'd have to consider your post a 'plant' because your timing is either very coincidental or it's very suspicious.. now understand I mean no insult in this post, except to the devs, I am simply forwarding a thought that I was instantly struck with as soon as I saw your post and when it was posted.
You see, there is a sequel to this that will be out soon and which was funded on kickstarter, now the fact of Kickstarter is that it has been fuelled largely, and has been a huge hit for, nostalgia based projects and this sequel is no different, but it has also received most of it praise for DRM-FREE (meaning for a lot of people NOT online) based gaming which goes hand in hand with the whole nostalgia thing.
This project managed to complete it's funding BECAUSE of that DRM-FREE promise, there is no doubt that a lot of projects fall into this category and without that specific condition would not have succeeded in their campaigns.. and this is where it all falls apart.
Elite:Dangerous (as the sequel is called) traded on the promise of being an offline DRM-FREE product, and succeeded because of the that, it wouldn't have received the hype, or willingness to fund if that hadn't been part of the deal, I can say this because I know the nostalgia based audience being, myself, thoroughly up to my neck in it, yes other's who might not care either way funded it, but the nostalgia audience got the ball rolling and kept it going, yet within the past 36 hrs it has been announced that the developers making the sequel have reneged on that legally binding agreement, changing the status of the game to ONLINE ONLY, to the detriment of the very people who funded this and without whom the very game would never have been made. This is scandalous. I understand that the new gen who are growing up now have no concept of what non-internet dependant gaming means, however that fact is not an excuse for their arguement against it and their vocal acceptance of this situation, the fact is that this was a promise made and has now become a promise broken.
Do you see where my point lies? You have made a post, expounding the virtues of a game, prompting comments of 'whoop' for the sequel with no mention of current controversy at the very time that the whole issue has gone to hell... Do you see where my suspicions come from?
I would have to consider this post, or at least 'the thought has crossed my mind', almost certainly erroneously so, that this is nothing more than a damage control exercise meant to drum up interest in the now badly marred sequel lending to the obfuscation of the actual issues, or what SHOULD be the actual issues, at hand.
As far as I'm concerned the whole matter has become a LIE,... now I understand the whole "not a lie because of lack of intent" issue, HOWEVER if one makes a promise, a legally binding promise remember that, and thinks so little of their word that breaking it down the line is even an option regardless of the circumstances, then the promisemakers have such little regard for the intent of their promise as to make it a "promise made IN BAD FAITH".. it doesn't matter their excuses down the line, their promise, their very word at the time of making it, means so little to them that they consider themselves to have the option of reneging on that promise/legally binding agreement if they feel like it, and that MAKES IT A LIE by any other words.
So yes, while the original Elite was a worthy game, the developers should not gain any kudos for a sequel, because of what has turned out to be their 'lie', their obfuscation, their funding under false precepts.
I, personally.. and remember this is all simply opinion, would like to see the developers penalised for this, actually I'd love to see them dragged through the courts by their hair.. opinion remember, by means of very bad press and a failed disaster of a sequel project... The unfortunate case being that the majority of the market no longer care about integrity, keeping one's promises, or in fact DRM-FREE products, and this is horrible because behaviour and obfuscation such as this will continue because of that. This is bad overall for the expected and agreed public expectation of future projects. It is bad news and a bad thing to do.
Please don't buy their sequel.
..we now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcasting...