Posted October 30, 2008
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d753/4d753f3db72fafb9a1d7655ec60060020e30877d" alt="avatar"
Well, it's not like you HAVE to play it again and again. But if the game is good and you really like it, then if it offers a somewhat different experience upon a replay, that's certainly a point in its favor, IMO. Personally, I'd rather have a great game that I can play for 30 to 50 hours and then replay for that long again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d753/4d753f3db72fafb9a1d7655ec60060020e30877d" alt="avatar"
(but is replaying from a branching point really replaying? I'd say no)
I think this is part of the replayability factor though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d753/4d753f3db72fafb9a1d7655ec60060020e30877d" alt="avatar"
Portal was perfect.
While I have some games that were a chore to finish once, others were enjoyable enough to me that I don't hesitate to play them again and again. I realize some people look at their games as disposable one-shot commodities and there's nothing wrong with that, but others consider replayability a large part of the game's value.