It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)When you see it ...(23 posts)(23 posts)
(23 posts)
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Posted March 19, 2010
Also this:
http://www.largehardoncollider.com/ Not Safe For Work At All.
Posted March 20, 2010
Ermm...I'm sorry, what?
Posted March 20, 2010
Ahh, I'm so used to seeing that stuff, I mentally fix transposition errors and just read what they're supposed to say.
Suppose a "large hardon collider" could well be the inspiration for a gay porn movie but I'd have to sit there nitpicking the scientific inaccuracies
Posted March 20, 2010
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: I'm surprised this typo hasn't occurred more often.

Anyone using a word processor with a half-decent spell check won't make this mistake; "hadron" and "hard-on" are both accepted, but "hardon" is not. Titles are far more susceptible to typos than body text since they are more likely to be done on the fly without sufficient checking, which is why this mistake is in the title only. The only way you could make this typo in body text while actually paying attention to the spell check would be if you thought that the word was marked because it wasn't in the word processor's dictionary (something no good journalist would assume).
Posted March 20, 2010
avatar
Aliasalpha: Ahh, I'm so used to seeing that stuff, I mentally fix transposition errors and just read what they're supposed to say.
Suppose a "large hardon collider" could well be the inspiration for a gay porn movie but I'd have to sit there nitpicking the scientific inaccuracies

Haha I know what you mean, I didn't get it until I looked at the comments.
Posted March 20, 2010
avatar
Aliasalpha: Ahh, I'm so used to seeing that stuff, I mentally fix transposition errors and just read what they're supposed to say.
Suppose a "large hardon collider" could well be the inspiration for a gay porn movie but I'd have to sit there nitpicking the scientific inaccuracies

Or the moral inaccuracies... OH SNAP GAY PEOPLE
Posted March 20, 2010
It could make a good morality tale. A what-if scenario based on the theory that the LHC would destroy the world (or at least make it all Falllouty, easier to stage than a planet being shattered by a singularity) and whether it's morally right to put society at risk, no matter how small, for the sake of scientific advancement.
It can star the physicist who's fatal miscalculation destroyed society and the environmental scientist who's predictions of disaster were tragically prophetic. The film can cover their arguments, their recriminations, the debates over "crossing that line that man was not meant to cross" and of course their throbbing erections.
Why the hell am I trying to get into IT when I clearly have a talent for making up bullshit porno stories?
Post edited March 20, 2010 by Aliasalpha
Posted March 20, 2010
avatar
Aliasalpha: It could make a good morality tale. A what-if scenario based on the theory that the LHC would destroy the world (or at least make it all Falllouty, easier to stage than a planet being shattered by a singularity) and whether it's morally right to put society at risk, no matter how small, for the sake of scientific advancement.
It can star the physicist who's fatal miscalculation destroyed society and the environmental scientist who's predictions of disaster were tragically prophetic. The film can cover their arguments, their recriminations, the debates over "crossing that line that man was not meant to cross" and of course their throbbing erections.
Why the hell am I trying to get into IT when I clearly have a talent for making up bullshit porno stories?

Because nobody watches porn for the stories. You know that.
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)When you see it ...(23 posts)(23 posts)
(23 posts)