Posted April 10, 2018
I allow the possibility that "somewhere, out there" is existing some living form (or more specifically - intelligent form, because to find "any" living form (e.g. bacterias) outside earth we don't even need to leave solar system).
And that's it. I'm generally against using forms of "believe in" to things, which are possible (and what is more - necessary) to prove. I can "believe in..." in case of religion, philosophical "belief" etc. That's totally adequate and fine, since in faith we're not expecting, not need nor can "prove" (in manner of empiristic science) existance of God or such values as truth, good etc. Which doesn't mean that they don't exist.
In case of any life form though... I simply don't feel it's right to "believe" in it. Allowing for possibility - yeah, that sounds good. It sounds good due to the fact that we're facing "great unknown" - universe beyond our capabilities to observe it (due to technical limits). But it's as safe as assumption that we're totally "alone" in universe.
And that's it. I'm generally against using forms of "believe in" to things, which are possible (and what is more - necessary) to prove. I can "believe in..." in case of religion, philosophical "belief" etc. That's totally adequate and fine, since in faith we're not expecting, not need nor can "prove" (in manner of empiristic science) existance of God or such values as truth, good etc. Which doesn't mean that they don't exist.
In case of any life form though... I simply don't feel it's right to "believe" in it. Allowing for possibility - yeah, that sounds good. It sounds good due to the fact that we're facing "great unknown" - universe beyond our capabilities to observe it (due to technical limits). But it's as safe as assumption that we're totally "alone" in universe.