sh7t7: Current estimates put the number of stars in our universe at 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
We're not alone, I'm pretty sure.
Tallima: I attended an MIT profs' lecture and there he said the chance of spontaneously creating a living cell was 1 in 100 times the proton masses of the known universe (I think it was 1x10 to the 40).
Yes but living by what standards? Goes back to what we discussed earlier in the thread. I'm not saying your point ins't valid, it's very valid, and while I do believe in life out there I don't just assume how obvious it is based on sheer number of planets. But I just think we need to guard against basing the possibility of life on our current understanding of life.
In grade school I had a teacher who drove me nuts because he used to claim, "There can't be life on that planet because there is no oxygen."
-Who's to day it breaths oxygen?
"There's no carbon! Life needs carbon."
-No, carbon based life needs carbon. How do we know it's not based on something else? How do we know it's not based on an element we don't even know about?