As they exist only in your head, it's completely up to you what plays in their head in your head every time you post.

This is what I hear when you post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PgXtnPbURc

This is what I hear when you post https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlSx7m09R60

WTF

This speaks volumes about your perception of the world.

Not at all. It takes more than one Youtube video see my perception of the world. Hope you enjoyed the video. Have a nice day!

And this is what I hear in my head. Because I don't give a rat's ass about all this internet drama. It's just an 80's party in there, all the time. And they've just delivered the cheese.

Here is some extra cheese. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFLGRidfFo4

Religion, Morals, "SAVE THE CHILDREN!!" and other stupidities applied to PIXELS

In the Funny side:

Women feel more sexy playing violent videogames, a survey says... meanwhile maybe some others feel sexy battling on Twitter, each one has their own fetishes...
http://www.geek.com/games/study-finds-playing-violent-video-games-makes-women-feel-sexy-1627639/

Puritan rotten roots depends on the culture, and each one has their own contradictions
https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/moral-standard-weirdness-violence-ok-but-no-sex-vs-sex-ok-but-no-violence-puritan-norway

Violence is a good thing if it is used for a "good cause" and sex is blatantly WRONG almost everytime in USA, as the breasts or the ass of some popstars almost induce a moral crisis in the country. But shootings are a result usually, of videogames... not mad people that has easy access to... guns... even feminists blame sexy appealing other women for ths issue, well I should say "puritans feminists". Beyond we leave the times showing their legs was a revolution, now is time for "slut shaming" all over (even to pixels women, Spiderman vs Spiderwoman thing should show clearly who can still move his/her ass in front of the morale police)
http://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-American-public-more-accepting-of-violent-content-than-sexual-content-in-TV-movies-and-video-games

A funny ban nobody is talking about, just found it, so HATRED is ok for VALVE, but not a ¨dating sexy¨game... didnt check the game, but for you who think that VALVE is so open minded with HATRED well... guns and going POSTAL seems that is more acceptable than a sexy/dating simulator... LOL I guess the developer should include the option to be a woman, but did we have any problem with LARRY´s games? Seriously I never liked them, but... isn´t about the same?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/119475-Developer-Blames-American-Culture-for-Greenlight-Ban?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=news

Meanwhile we fight for the rights of pixels, some of our governments bomb civils, or sell weapons in or to some "isolated" wars or to some ironically criticized countries, many of them make constant economic deals with countries were women have no the same rights as men, almost all them, impart the economic violence of censorship, overcontrol, and put their economic failures in our shoulders.

But hey! PIXELS!!! They are the root of all evil.

So this is what I hear when I read you, to follow the trend...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI-mDTdeKR8

We stopped caring about this...oh, over a month ago. I think we all decided Hatred is a game. And that's about it. It's nice that you still want to defend it.

Indeed. It's a game I have barely any opinion on, but I've heard it's bad. And I don't mean 'evil' bad, I mean 'shitty' bad.

Wrong, YOU stopped caring, most of those who want the game on GOG still care, but we are not as pushy as the vocal minority that intends to censor video games.

Hatred a bad game? Seriously, I already said that!

And shitty? Nah! is pretty funny, is just very bad optimized, POSTAL is a shitty game, exactly the same thing with the worst controls ever...

If we were half as vocal as SJWs are, we would have tons of erotic games and violent games on GOG. Amybe we should start signing petitions and pestering publishers and distributers, they seem to like that kind of shit treatment, because by listening to them, they only encourage that behavior.

Are they that vocal? I've not seen anyone arguing in favour of censorship.

I have, for example Anita Sarkeesian.