It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Statements by both the developers and the Australian Classification Board:


Developers:

"To our Australian fans, we share your frustration," a studio spokesperson wrote. "We will work with the ACB on the classification. If the government maintains its stance, we will make sure that you can get a refund, and we will work directly with affected Kickstarter backers to figure something out. We would appreciate if you give us a little bit of time to appeal the decision before making a call."

It continued: "We Happy Few is set in a dystopian society, and the first scene consists of the player character redacting material that could cause offense to 'society at large', as part of his job as a government 'archivist'. It’s a society that is forcing its citizens to take Joy, and the whole point of the game is to reject this programming and fight back. In this context, our game’s overarching social commentary is no different than Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, or Terry Gilliam's Brazil."
Australian Classification Board:

Gameplay consists of exploring the fictional English town of Wellington Wells in first-person as three separate playable characters, where non-playing characters consume the government-mandated, fictional drug “Joy” in the form of pills, which include side-effects such as euphoria and memory loss. When the player consumes Joy, surreal, psychedelic sequences including butterflies and brightly-coloured street-scapes appear. In keeping with the fantasy setting, character models and environments are brightly-coloured and stylised.

Players have the option to conform with NPCs and take Joy pills when exploring the Village or Parade District areas of the game. If a player has not taken Joy, NPCs become hostile towards the player if they perform behaviours including running, jumping and staring. An NPC character called the Doctor can detect when the player has not taken Joy and will subsequently raise an alarm. A player that takes Joy can reduce gameplay difficulty, therefore receiving an incentive by progressing through the game quickly. Although there are alternative methods to complete the game, gameplay requires the player to take Joy to progress.

In one sequence, an NPC is viewed on the ground, convulsing owing to a reaction from taking a Joy pill, which has subsequently turned bad. After several NPCs encourage her to take Joy and she refuses, fearing that it will have an adverse effect, they beat her with steel pots and a shovel, until she is implicitly killed. In another sequence, the player is seen in first-person view, entering a telephone box that contains three large pill dispensers, each holding a different flavoured Joy pill. The player consumes a Joy pill and a swarm of brightly-coloured butterflies appear as well as rainbows and coloured pathways on the ground, improving speed and visibility for the player.

In the Board’s opinion, the game’s drug-use mechanic making game progression less difficult constitutes an incentive or reward for drug-use and therefore, the game exceeds the R 18+ classification that states, “drug use related to incentives and rewards is not permitted”.

Therefore, the game warrants being Refused Classification.
Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/we-happy-few-studio-addresses-the-games-ban-in-australia/
It's kind of beautiful that the game in qustion already seems to be the perfect commentary on this situation.
Isn't that how totalitarian regimes work? Just like Breja said, the game itself is the answer you're looking for.
In moments like these, I'm glad I live in a "normal" country. If a game would be banned in my country that I wanted to play, I would simply get it by "other" means. It's the same with censorship. For example, playing Fallout New Vegas without Killable Children mod is a no go. No I didn't hunt down all kids in the game immediately after I installed the mod, but I will not conform to someone's view of morality and let him force it on me in a friggin game. A GAME FFS!!!

We are people who can think for themselves, not mindless drones who need direction from a so called "authority". There is still this nonsensical myth in some countries that think that if I play uncensored Carmageddon for a minute, I would immediately go on a rampage and run over people for credits.

Condolences especially to Germans and Aussies. They have to deal with this BS the most.
Maybe the Aussie government really is adding something to the water and they took one look at this game and thought "shit, they're onto us".
avatar
ChrisGamer300: Same here, it's beyond me how We Happy Few can be "offensive" enough to be complete blocked in Australia, it's utterly pathetic i mean it's a fucking game not meant to be taken seriously and i have watched gameplay of the game and nothing i saw there was anything remotely close to be worth refusing classification of the game over.

It speaks volumes about how those people responsible for this are and personally i would hate (understatement) having them telling me what to play and not play.

It kinda makes me worried when games are starting to get banned here and actual good ones on top of that, it's not like i'm going to pursue a career of a drug lord after playing a game with those themes in it.
And We Happy Few doesn't even have graphic depictions of real drug addiction, unless you count the pinata scene early in the early access, and even that is to demonstrate that "drugs are bad, mmkay?"
Australia = HELL for gamers.
And this is why I'm thankful the ESRB exists in the US. Letting the goverment regulate video games is just a bad idea. They're far from perfect for sure but anything is better than letting the government control it.
Anyone know if the movie "Equilibrium" is also banned in Australia?
avatar
book99: Anyone know if the movie "Equilibrium" is also banned in Australia?
Yeah, because it sucks. :P

I kid.
avatar
book99: Anyone know if the movie "Equilibrium" is also banned in Australia?
Rated M in Australia according to IMDB.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0238380/parentalguide/certificates
avatar
paladin181: I don't understand the mentality of "It offends the old shits in the government, so you should also be offended. It's ok, we'll keep you from being offended so you don't have to."

Christ on a crutch. I'll get a couple of keys for our friends down under at some point, because fuck government censorship.

I wonder who these "reasonable adults" are and why they are offended by showing the bad of putting on a happy face. In this case, it's depicted by a drug, but it's no different than rebels refusing to toe the company line or refusing to accept the happy-go-lucky attitude of the face of a government. Hell, the game could take place in N Korea without the drugs. If you don't pretend to accept, you are ostracized, hunted, persecuted and prosecuted.
avatar
ChrisGamer300: Same here, it's beyond me how We Happy Few can be "offensive" enough to be complete blocked in Australia, it's utterly pathetic i mean it's a fucking game not meant to be taken seriously and i have watched gameplay of the game and nothing i saw there was anything remotely close to be worth refusing classification of the game over.

It speaks volumes about how those people responsible for this are and personally i would hate (understatement) having them telling me what to play and not play.

It kinda makes me worried when games are starting to get banned here and actual good ones on top of that, it's not like i'm going to pursue a career of a drug lord after playing a game with those themes in it.
I don't think this is about being offended. this is about drug use, and really - who get offended by that?

The point here is that Australia (as some other countries) has some regulations on how drug use may be portrayed in games and other media. and the fact is that a lot of We Happy Few revolves around the use of the drug Joy. All NPC's in this world use this drug, and it also an option for the player to do so.

so it is just the fact that the game portrays drug use, and that the player can use drugs themselves. it is important in this game, and therefore triggers those regulations. but no one is offended, as such.
avatar
amok: The point here is that Australia (as some other countries) has some regulations on how drug use may be portrayed in games and other media. and the fact is that a lot of We Happy Few revolves around the use of the drug Joy. All NPC's in this world use this drug, and it also an option for the player to do so.

so it is just the fact that the game portrays drug use, and that the player can use drugs themselves. it is important in this game, and therefore triggers those regulations. but no one is offended, as such.
To which I say: fuck government.

Treat people like imbeciles that need to be told how to do every little thing and that's exactly what they'll become.
avatar
ChrisGamer300: Same here, it's beyond me how We Happy Few can be "offensive" enough to be complete blocked in Australia, it's utterly pathetic i mean it's a fucking game not meant to be taken seriously and i have watched gameplay of the game and nothing i saw there was anything remotely close to be worth refusing classification of the game over.

It speaks volumes about how those people responsible for this are and personally i would hate (understatement) having them telling me what to play and not play.

It kinda makes me worried when games are starting to get banned here and actual good ones on top of that, it's not like i'm going to pursue a career of a drug lord after playing a game with those themes in it.
avatar
amok: I don't think this is about being offended. this is about drug use, and really - who get offended by that?

The point here is that Australia (as some other countries) has some regulations on how drug use may be portrayed in games and other media. and the fact is that a lot of We Happy Few revolves around the use of the drug Joy. All NPC's in this world use this drug, and it also an option for the player to do so.

so it is just the fact that the game portrays drug use, and that the player can use drugs themselves. it is important in this game, and therefore triggers those regulations. but no one is offended, as such.
True but do gamers need their goverments claiming moral high ground while policing the entertainent they consume even though you are an adult who can take responsiblity for your own actions or most can atleast, The drug use in We Happy Few isn't worse than the shit you can do in other games anyway, the australian goverment are somehow fixated on drug use for some reason.

Fallout 3 was originally banned in australia for drug use until it got censored while shooting body parts of people was fine, enslaving people was fine etc, it smells of double standard to me.

They can have a warning text about drug use on the game if they must but outright forbid people to buy is not the best solution, soon the goverment will decide when you can eat, sleep and shit too.
Post edited May 25, 2018 by ChrisGamer300
avatar
amok: I don't think this is about being offended. this is about drug use, and really - who get offended by that?

The point here is that Australia (as some other countries) has some regulations on how drug use may be portrayed in games and other media. and the fact is that a lot of We Happy Few revolves around the use of the drug Joy. All NPC's in this world use this drug, and it also an option for the player to do so.

so it is just the fact that the game portrays drug use, and that the player can use drugs themselves. it is important in this game, and therefore triggers those regulations. but no one is offended, as such.
avatar
ChrisGamer300: True but do gamers need their goverments claiming moral high ground while policing the entertainent they consume even though you are an adult who can take responsiblity for your own actions or most can atleast, The drug use in We Happy Few isn't worse than the shit you can do in other games anyway, the australian goverment are somehow fixated on drug use for some reason.
I guess it depends on how the drug use is portrayed, not whether there is or not.

avatar
ChrisGamer300: Fallout 3 was originally banned in australia for drug use until it got censored while shooting body parts of people was fine, enslaving people was fine etc, it smells of double standard to me.
actually, it is not double standards as these are two different issues. I don't agree with it, but it is not double standards.

avatar
ChrisGamer300: They can have a warning text about drug use on the game if they must but outright forbid people to buy is not the best solution, soon the goverment will decide when you can eat, sleep and shit too.
I don't know enough about Australian regulations to comment. I imagine there are sort of scales involved, the degree and portrayal and such.