Navagon: Disliking Activision, doesn't necessarily blind people to the truth. Clearly no party is innocent in this.
Delixe: This.
It's bloody obvious that no one has been told the full truth about what has gone on at IW. On one hand you have the guys saying Activision sacked them to avoid paying them what they are legally owed and that Activision sent in 'bouncers' to clamp down the whole office. Seems a bit extreme unless Activision were worried they were taking something to a competitor. While the guys are saying they are innocent Activision claim they were in talks to jump to a fierce competitor (which could only mean EA) and lo and behold they wasted no time announcing this publishing deal with EA.
Two things can happen now. We will have to wait until they go to court and we find the truth out or Activision will settle out of court. I would imagine for all the posturing and mum cussing the latter is more likely.
I have a feeling it was Activision rushing to keep secrets in house. But everyone is right, it will all settle out of court and it is 50-50 that IW will keep the Call of Duty brand by the end of it. I think that IW Heads asked for more money out of contract, Activision refused so the heads threatened to go to another company, Activision clamped down on IW and booted the troublemakers under threat of Lawsuit. Kicked out heads go to EA and get signed, lawsuit will be settled out of court and life will go on.