It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
sunshinecorp: Depends on the overall mood of the game. Yes, games that are not entirely comedic or parodies or just plainly ecchi should care a bit more about balancing the eye candy to realism ration, otherwise it can be very distracting in an annoying way.
I agree, games with a comical element can get away with it a little more. But as many games now, especially AAA games, are trying to be taken as serious games, it seems silly they still use the eye candy over realism approach.

I guess it depends on how they go about it. If it is done "tastefully" then it's okay, but others seem to think the players are school boys looking for a cheap frill and will sit there giggling at seeing the female characters arse on the screen every two minutes.
avatar
FearfulSymmetry: I haven't played any of those games, so unfortunately I can't comment on that. I'm not always happy with the bikini armor that is often present in games, but that is mostly because it makes no sense whatsoever from a practical point of view. "Great, let's expose all these vital organs!" Yes, brilliant idea.
avatar
sunshinecorp: There is nothing that describes this better than yet another super-relevant College Humor video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTGh0EMmMC8

Personally, I love seeing unrealistic but sexy armor, for the eye candy. But yes, it's idiotic as armor.
Somewhat relevant: XD
avatar
sunshinecorp: There is nothing that describes this better than yet another super-relevant College Humor video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTGh0EMmMC8

Personally, I love seeing unrealistic but sexy armor, for the eye candy. But yes, it's idiotic as armor.
avatar
FoxySage: Somewhat relevant: XD
lol :)
avatar
sunshinecorp: Personally, I love seeing unrealistic but sexy armor, for the eye candy. But yes, it's idiotic as armor.
avatar
ddickinson: I guess it could be compared to the Conan the Barbarian kind of armour, or the Spartan armour, just a bunch of guys in their underpants. But it is silly when you have the male characters in full plate armour and the female wearing as little as possible. While I understand the the developers are going for the eye candy look, it should at least fit the game and not be so out of place. There are several games that manage to balance the whole eye candy and (almost) practical armour for women, others don't seem to care and just go for 100% eye candy.
Agreed, it's really odd to have the men in full body armor and the women barely dressed. As I mentioned before, it's not an issue for me when both genders are pretty much wearing bikini armor, because then it does not feel odd, and simply appears to be part of the setting. However, of course I also like eye candy. For instance, I kind of like the Blood Dragon armor set from Mass Effect on my women (picture below). It manages to be pretty without being completely useless.

And I agree with what you said about the giveaway, ddickinson. It is kind of odd to see people being so affronted by this thread when everyday there are women who are denied basic rights, women who are raped or killed for comitting 'adultery' or even just women who are not allowed to drive. Of course I'm not saying that it's only women who suffer, as there are many men without access to basic rights as well, but it seems especially skewed to complain about such a small thing as a giveaway in light of such matters.
Attachments:
image1.jpg (391 Kb)
Post edited October 20, 2014 by FearfulSymmetry
avatar
FoxySage: Somewhat relevant: XD
That's a very good example of what the male armour would be like if it matched the female armour. But don't worry, I'm sure in that game a woman in full body armour will be around to protect him and rescue him from the nasty bad guy :-).
#GiveawayGate ;P

I don't see why a fairly innocuous giveaway needs to be politicized. So, +1 for the giveaway and for the nice idea for a discussion (the favourite genre one, that is).
avatar
FearfulSymmetry: For instance, I kind of like the Blood Dragon armor set from Mass Effect on my women (picture below). It manages to be pretty without being completely useless.
The Mass Effect female lead ("femshep" as it's "lovingly" called) is also much better than the male counterpart. I tried playing with a male character but he was too wooden. Jennifer Hale's voice acting on ME is probably one of the most brilliant I've ever heard.
avatar
fronzelneekburm: #GiveawayGate ;P
LOL
Post edited October 20, 2014 by sunshinecorp
avatar
FearfulSymmetry: However, of course I also like eye candy. For instance, I kind of like the Blood Dragon armor set from Mass Effect on my women (picture below). It manages to be pretty without being completely useless.
The armour does look nice, and fit for purpose. It looks like it is functional and practice, while still looking pretty at the same time.
avatar
FoxySage: Somewhat relevant: XD
avatar
ddickinson: That's a very good example of what the male armour would be like if it matched the female armour. But don't worry, I'm sure in that game a woman in full body armour will be around to protect him and rescue him from the nasty bad guy :-).
I certainly hope so! ;)

.... That was what i would be saying if i cared about characters as anything other than meatshields for the strong, independent mage in the party. :P
Post edited October 20, 2014 by FoxySage
avatar
ddickinson: I tried to keep out of the discussion, mainly because I still find it hard to believe that something as innocent as a themed giveaway would cause such a fuss and also because I was hoping it would pass and we could get on with the actual topic. However, out of curiosity, to all those who seem to find this thread offensive, would you still be against this thread if there was no giveaway? If I had simply hosted a discussion asking the female gamers here to discuss their gaming choices, would this have been any different? If I had asked for only the women to respond because I valued their opinions, but offered no prizes, would that be any different?
There were always going to be a few dissenters to this sort of thing, though if you're interested, I suspect it was a mistake to add that subtitle. Something like ‘Just for the girls’ would've sufficed. ‘No boys allowed’ specifically mentions the group you’re excluding, which could be mistaken for a little passive-aggressive swipe at the guys.

Oh and it also brings up unpleasant memories of trying to get into our cousin's Playhouse and being foiled constantly like a Loony Toons villain, but that’s neither here nor there.
Post edited October 20, 2014 by markrichardb
avatar
markrichardb: Oh and it also brings up unpleasant memories of trying to get into our cousin's Playhouse and being foiled constantly like a Loony Toons villain, but that’s neither here nor there.
That's a pretty good idea for a kid's stealth game!
avatar
MadyNora:
I couldn't have said this better myself. Hopefully, this can be the cork that plugs that conversation so the thread can get back to what it was meant to be.

More on topic, I have really enjoyed reading through the posts that the "fairer gamers" have been sharing here. The one thing that has really surprised me is the amount of posts that mention having been into games since the Commodore 64 days. This leads to my preface for a question I would like to ask:

Let me first say, as we all know, that it is much more socially acceptable to be a "geek" in today's society. Talking about geeky things is a lot easier to do these days, both in a real-world setting or online. When I was a kid through the 80's and into the early 90's, geek culture was very niche and made up of a rather quiet, private (and male-dominated) bunch. Most of the friends I made were people who I noticed as they sketched in a notebook at school lunch or sneaking a sideways glance at a comic book or a GameBoy in someone's backpack as they backed up at the end of a class. In short, being geeky wasn't something that you advertised.

Of all the times I went to a comic book store or a D&D meet-up, I never saw any girls there. Yet, now, in our much more progressive times, I always hear stories about girls who have been into comics and gaming and such their whole life. So, with all that said, I pose this question to the women here: Where were you back then? Were you forced into even stricter silence due to the unfair stereotypes of the day? Or did our proverbial paths just never cross until now?

Disclaimer: I ask this out of sheer and honest curiosity. I am not challenging anyone's "gaming cred" or attempting to make anyone feel awkward. If you are getting that vibe, please accept my apology and do not feel forced into replying. I just want to try and bring some light-hearted conversation back into this thread. Thanks!
avatar
FoxySage: Somewhat relevant: XD
avatar
ddickinson: That's a very good example of what the male armour would be like if it matched the female armour. But don't worry, I'm sure in that game a woman in full body armour will be around to protect him and rescue him from the nasty bad guy :-).
I remember during the Pillars of Eternity KS campaign the devs modified the artwork of a female NPC because the backers complained about the armour (unrealistic boobs armour...)

avatar
Tekkaman-James: Of all the times I went to a comic book store or a D&D meet-up, I never saw any girls there. Yet, now, in our much more progressive times, I always hear stories about girls who have been into comics and gaming and such their whole life. So, with all that said, I pose this question to the women here: Where were you back then? Were you forced into even stricter silence due to the unfair stereotypes of the day? Or did our proverbial paths just never cross until now?
Well, don't know how relevant my answer is because I'm not from USA, but I never was forced to hide my interest in games and comics, even with some people thinking this was strange in a woman
Post edited October 20, 2014 by gandalfnho
avatar
Tekkaman-James: Where were you back then? Were you forced into even stricter silence due to the unfair stereotypes of the day? Or did our proverbial paths just never cross until now?
I can only speak for myself, but for me it was like this:
When I was a teenager I went to comic stores, I played MtG, I played computer games but I did that outside of those established mostly male circles. I recruited my mostly female friends for my hobbies. I lent them my comics to be able to talk with them about it, I got them to play computer games with me etc. And I had one male best friend who was also into all that stuff which was very lucky for me. :-D

When I got older and got into P&P RPGs my circles suddenly crossed with those male circles. And I was suddenly a unicorn. My hobbies, which until then felt pretty normal to me were suddenly kind of "special". *shrugs*
Strangely enough I never had trouble with my "male dominated hobbies" (including Blood Bowl) in real life, it's only online that I meet ... less understanding and friendly people.

So yeah, I'd go with the "our paths just never crossed" theory for my case.
avatar
Tekkaman-James: [...]

Of all the times I went to a comic book store or a D&D meet-up, I never saw any girls there. [...]
My own experience wouldn't classify comics as "taboo" back in the 70s, 80s and 90s. My group of friends was a mixed bunch of boys and girls, and the comics made the rounds among us with no exception. Can't remember that there was an issue with girls purchasing comics, not even that they got heat at home from the parents for being into them.

Edit: typo
Post edited October 20, 2014 by HypersomniacLive