StingingVelvet: It depends for me. I think the realism chase is a silly one in most genres and settings. I'd usually take something like Dishonored over a hyper-realistic game. If you use a bit of style, a little exaggeration, then you don't need to chase realism all the time and it probably looks cooler. nVidia showed this marble demo and people are freaking out about how real it looks, and it's neat as a tech demo, but for a real game I'd take a stylized and well designed look over stuff like that in a heartbeat.
However I do care about things like draw distance, the size of the world, the number of NPCs on screen at once, etc. etc. I think that stuff is important for all games, and hopefully the consoles having better processors and memory this time allows it to happen on PC more.
These are all good points and I believe I agree with it fully.
That said, they'll likely mostly go the "better eye candy" route in many cases.....4k then 8k goals, etc.....as that is what many of them seem to think is most important.
With me, i'd rather just not have only around 6-8 hour SP campaigns...even with amazing graphics.
------------
Radiance1979: if the performance upgrade is anything around 50% that would usually mean it is almost mandatory to upgrade,
Unless a certain game needs a particular feature only on newer cards and most games run(or will run for the next few years) on at least medium settings on one's card there is
imo little reason to upgrade....but a good number of people(
including me at some points) either are overly focused on future proofing or just like shiny and new things.