Official Vote Count

Lifthrasil - 1 Votes (Bookwyrm627 109)

Hunter65536 - 0 Votes (Bookwyrm627 49/109)

HypersomniacLive - 0 Votes

Bookwyrm627 - 2 Votes (Lifthrasil 13/25; flubbucket 71/105; trentonlf 81; Lifthrasil 110)

trentonlf - 0 Votes

flubbucket - 0 Votes (HypersomniacLive 16/65)

Sage103082 - 1 Votes (flubbucket 19/44; Bookwyrm627 26/49; Lifthrasil 56/110; flubbucket 105)

dedoporno - 0 Votes (Hunter65536 7/118)

No Lynch - 0 Votes

Inanimate Objects and/or Moderators - 0 Votes (trentonlf 8/81; Sage103082 12/106)

Not Currently Voting: dedoporno, HypersomniacLive, Sage103082, Hunter65536

------------------------------------------------------------------------

With 5 votes required to lynch, Bookwyrm627 is closest at L-3.

Deadline for D1 is sometime between Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning, EU time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Format:
<player voted> - <# of current votes> Votes (<player voting> <post voted>/<post unvoted, if applicable>)

Underlined votes are currently active.

All values will revert to 0 and/or blank at the start of a new Day.

I figured it would be obvious that the unbolded votes on Sage and Trent were not to be taken seriously, since the "logic" behind those invalid votes was absurd even for Day 1 voting.

-----

On a more relevant note: I am very concerned by the lack of direction from Hunter, Sage, and Flub. If any of these were converted, they would basically have a clean slate to work with as a cultist. This is not a good thing for town, and I would like to see more reads or something from these players.

Thanks, just wanted to make things clear.


Not to give them a free pass or anything but they feel mostly like themselves from past games - everyone is more or less doing what they are "expected" to do. But I do like to hear some more from Sage, as she did stand out a tiny bit at the beginning.

A catholic priest, a baptist preacher, and bookwyrm are discussing tithing and how much to really give to God. The Catholic priest draws a circle on the ground and stands in the middle of it as he throws some money into the air. He says "Whatever lands in the circle is what is God's portion and the rest I keep". The Baptist preacher stands in the circle and throws the money into the air and says "Whatever money lands outside the circle is God's portion and the rest I keep". Bookwyrm stands in the circle and throws the money in the air and says "Whatever money belongs to God he will keep before it hits the ground and the rest I keep"



Unvote Bookwyrm

What if one f them is doing the converting?

So how did the joke lead in to the unvote?

Then the usual problem of scum sliding by without talking applies.

I don't always agree with what bookwyrm does, he often makes me quirk my eyebrows, but he's a very smart guy and I'm starting to think what he's doing is something that the CL would not do. I also found his recent posts very pro town so for now I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Unfortunately my reads haven't developed that much yet, but I keep getting bad vibes from lift and HSL for some reason. Just a gut feeling for now though.

When (where in the thread) did those bad vibes start?

Do you have any good vibes?

The Greater Good

You're still voting him, has anything changed since then?



No objection here. Why do you think JMich introduced the rule?



And yet you answered it underlining the phrase. Also, same question to you - why do you think JMich introduced the rule?


Three people before Lifthrasil drew your attention to that, yet it was only his post that made you click, even though you're not skimming through posts?



Doesn't ring a bell for me.


Did you miss my question about trentonlf?


Please point me to where I argued the rule is about posting restriction(s).

What do you think it's about?


[emphasis added]

You can? Interesting.

It's also interesting that you get on his case, making the exact same arguments others made before you, yet you don't acknowledge they did.

Are you practising what you told trentonlf to understand?

I am only speculating as only JMich really knows the reason, but I would guess JMich introduced the roll call as a way for players to keep others active and participating in the game.

Lift is the person who said what post it was in, when I went back after others said it and looked at the OP's it was shown as underlined there and I took it as what people were referencing. And no I'm not skimming posts, but I'm not rereading the whole thread either for something that was shown in the OP because it didn't seem that I needed to.

Post 110 changed the vote from being nearly farcical (only slightly better than my non-votes on Sage and Trent) to something more substantial.

Lift presented cases in such a way as none of them showed any redeeming value within my play, and any possible motivation that did have redeeming value was not stated.

-----

I acknowledge that I am at some fault in instigating this fascination with the "The Greater Good" posting rules/guidelines/whatever-you-want-to-call-it., but I think it is also a distraction and I can't help but wonder whether someone(s) are using it as a smoke screen for activity.

I figure JMich added "The Greater Good" as a source of amusement and flavor. In line with that, I strongly suggest just dropping it as an avenue of scum hunting. I don't see that such questions will lead anywhere useful, and we have a deadline.

My initial thoughts are for WIFOM.

I can let my mind wander and get a little paranoia brewing.

For instance, collating for The Greater Good tallies and seeing how each player stacks up.

Lifthrasil is in six of eight
Hunter is in four of eight
Bookwyrm is in all
Sage makes three misses one then makes three more
and so on etc....

You then compare these to Day Two, Day Three.....


But that seems crazy right??

This will be my last post before I reach Greece. In the unlikely case that things pick up speed and I'm not around to partake I'll leave what a couple of things I found interesting.


I don't know about not giving credit to the potential pro-town plays but Lift did look like he was reaching a bit too much on a couple of occasions. For example the mention of X-shot unknown power role was didn't make any sense.


This is where I have Sage to some extent. At the beginning of the game she, during the invalid roll call she skipped it along with a couple of other people (including myself) but she made sure to provide pro-actively mention it and provide an excuse about it, even though no one confronted her nor the others about it. Back then we haven't spoken about it that much yet, so regardless of what we think we know now a scenario where the CL doesn't know that much of it either is quite possible, so they might be on their toes just in case.


All in all, currently these 2 are the people of interest to me. Everyone else is mostly neutral. As for Bookwyrm, I think I understand what the plan he hinted about is, and even though this doesn't automatically clear him I'd rather allow it and see what comes out of it.


I'm not sure I want to leave a vote on anyone at the moment not knowing if I'll be able to control it in the next couple of days but if I had to it would be either on Sage or Lift.