Posted May 22, 2019
GoG,
As you can certainly tell from the forum recently, there is some worry about the lack of transparency in your game acceptance / rejection process. This worry has built into confusion about your methods and even anger regarding your perceived motives. All of this could be alleviated if you would simply do one thing:
1) release a breakdown regarding your reasonings for accepting / rejecting each game.
This would show your specific reasoning and build confidence in your system... and build greater validity to your curation. It would aid community building while keeping control of conspiracy theories and anger.
Transparency would benefit both you and the community. I hope you will see the benefits and institute making this information public.
As you can certainly tell from the forum recently, there is some worry about the lack of transparency in your game acceptance / rejection process. This worry has built into confusion about your methods and even anger regarding your perceived motives. All of this could be alleviated if you would simply do one thing:
1) release a breakdown regarding your reasonings for accepting / rejecting each game.
This would show your specific reasoning and build confidence in your system... and build greater validity to your curation. It would aid community building while keeping control of conspiracy theories and anger.
Transparency would benefit both you and the community. I hope you will see the benefits and institute making this information public.