Lenriak: I don't think so, I think he knows people are gonna rate the game bad because some fools are gonna think "13 years of development = one of the greatest games in existence" not realising that we really have absolutely no idea how much of those 13 years of content has been saved, scrapped, edited (over and over again) or even rebuilt from scratch. This iteration of Duke Nukem and all its content could only have had 2 years development for all we know (not counting everything thats scrapped)
Sogi-Ya: no, what he knows is that the game is flawed and probably too short. most of the content is scripted events (from what I have read about the demo) and titty jokes, that may be fine in Leisure Suit Larry but this is supposed to be a FPS.
... and it's a FPS that is going to be held up against Serrious Sam, not Duke 3D, and thats not a pleasant experience unless you got one hell of a game ... which they don't. Seeing as how this is Gearbox and 2K we
can expect that there will be a shit ton of expansion packs and no matter what the basic review can't be counted as the final product.
but thats both good and bad because while I like for games to be supported for years, I don't like to have to wait for years to get the whole game and I really don't like having to pay over and vier again to get it.
First off, most of the work that's in the game was done prior to Gearbox being brought in to clean it up for released. So, it's not unreasonable for him to want to point out that a lot of it might not be as well received as if his team had done it. That's natural, they didn't get to call the shots and as such don't want to take the blame if 3D Realms miscalculated.
Duke 3D is was smuttier than Leisure Suit Larry, I take it you haven't actually played it otherwise you'd remember the in game porn films and strippers, Leisure Suit Larry was pretty obscene at places, but he always got some sort of punishment for thinking about that stuff.
Additionally it's a valid point to mention that the fans aren't going to be happy with any reviewer that reviews the game based upon what they think 12 years worth of development ought to bring. It's not a fair metric especially given the number of times that they started over with a new engine.
And lastly, it's pretty clear that you've got some sort of inside information if you're claiming that the game is flawed, and yet you apparently haven't played the demo and are casting insults without even having played it. That's kind of low and not really a reflection of the sort of person that this game was meant for.